Karnataka High Court
WP/4414/2025 of RAMESH V Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010103552025 NC: 2026:KHC:54630 WP No. 4414 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1 ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.4414 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: RAMESH .V S/O VENKATESHAPPA .V AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.4414 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
RAMESH .V
S/O VENKATESHAPPA .V
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT TAMAKA, KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT – 563102.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
KOLAR CHIKABALLAPURA DISTRICT
CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS
SOCIETIES UNION LTD.,
KOLAR – 563 101.
(CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT)
2.
THE GENERAL MANAGER,
KOLAR CHIKABALLAPURA DISTRICT
CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS
SOCIETIES UNION LTD.,
KOLAR – 563 101.
(CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT)
3.
CHIKABALLAPURA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE
MILK PRODUCERS SOCIETIES UNION LTD.,
CHIKABALLAPURA – 562 101
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR/GENERAL MANAGER.
(AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT VIDE
COURT ORDER DATED 21.02.2025)
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
(BY SRI. SUMANTH L. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2; R-3 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS NOT TO RELIEVE OR STOP THE PETITIONER FROM
TRANSPORTING MILK FROM KOLAR DIARY AND PERMIT HIM TO
CONTINUE AS PER THE AGREEMENT DATED 16.06.2023 ANNEXURE- A AND THE ORDER DATED 19.06.2023 ANNEXURE-B PASSED BY THE
RESPONDENTS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’
GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition and files a memo to that effect. The memo reads as under: “The Counsel for Petitioners most humbly prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw this present petition as the petition has become Infructuous. Hence, filing this memo in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. The memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20