Karnataka High Court
WP/23249/2026 of SRI. NANJUNDA BHOVI @ NANJUNDAIAH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010512402026 NC: 2026:KHC:54957 WP No. 23249 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO.23249 OF 2026 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SRI. NANJUNDA BHOVI @ NANJUNDAIAH S/O LATE BUDDA BHOVI,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
WRIT PETITION NO.23249 OF 2026 (SC/ST)
BETWEEN:
SRI. NANJUNDA BHOVI @ NANJUNDAIAH
S/O LATE BUDDA BHOVI,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
SIDDA BHOVI PALYA,
BETHANGERE DHAKALE
BIDADI, RAMNAGARA - 562 123
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MURALI N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
RAMNAGARA TALUK,
MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA,
B.M. ROAD, RAMANAGARA - 562 159
3.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER &
SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
RAMNAGARA TALUK,
MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA,
B.M. ROAD, RAMANAGARA - 562 159
4.
THE TAHSILDAR
RAMNAGARA TALUK,
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
DISTRICT OFFICES COMPLEX,
B.M. ROAD, RAMANAGARA - 562 159
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Murali N., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Spoorthi V., High Court Government Pleader for respondents appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record.
HC-KAR
As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7