Karnataka High Court
WP/23782/2024 of SRI SUHAS L Vs M/S EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010490902024 NC: 2026:KHC:54671 WP No. 23782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 23782 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SUHAS L S/O LASKHAMIAH AGED ABOUT 39
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 23782 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SUHAS L
S/O LASKHAMIAH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT NO. 17/2,
9TH D CROSS
GOKUL 1ST STAGE,
2ND PHASE
MATHIKERE,
BENGALURU - 560 054.
2.
SMT. NIRMALA G
W/O SUHAS L
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO. 17/2,
9TH D CROSS
GOKUL 1ST STAGE,
2ND PHASE, MATHIKERE,
BENGALURU - 560 054.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SRIKANTH M.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
PAVITHRA B
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
M/S. EDELWEISS ASSET
RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
AT EDELWEISS HOUSE, 1ST FLOOR
OFF C.S.T ROAD, KALINA
MUMBAI - 400 098,
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/
REP. BY ITS ASSISTANT MANAGER
MR. RADHAKRISHNA NAIR
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIJAY S, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) QUASH THE
POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 15/04/2024 ISSUED UNDER
SECTION 13(4) OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 R/W RULE 8 OF THE
SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, 2002, BY THE
RESPONDENT, FOUND AT ANNX-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
HC-KAR
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8