Karnataka High Court

WP/23782/2024 of SRI SUHAS L Vs M/S EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010490902024 NC: 2026:KHC:54671 WP No. 23782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 23782 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SUHAS L S/O LASKHAMIAH AGED ABOUT 39

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA

WRIT PETITION NO. 23782 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. SUHAS L

S/O LASKHAMIAH

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

R/AT NO. 17/2,

9TH D CROSS

GOKUL 1ST STAGE,

2ND PHASE

MATHIKERE,

BENGALURU - 560 054.

2.

SMT. NIRMALA G

W/O SUHAS L

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

R/AT NO. 17/2,

9TH D CROSS

GOKUL 1ST STAGE,

2ND PHASE, MATHIKERE,

BENGALURU - 560 054.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SRIKANTH M.,ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by

PAVITHRA B

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

AND:

1.

M/S. EDELWEISS ASSET

RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED,

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE

AT EDELWEISS HOUSE, 1ST FLOOR

OFF C.S.T ROAD, KALINA

MUMBAI - 400 098,

REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/

REP. BY ITS ASSISTANT MANAGER

MR. RADHAKRISHNA NAIR

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. VIJAY S, ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) QUASH THE

POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 15/04/2024 ISSUED UNDER

SECTION 13(4) OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 R/W RULE 8 OF THE

SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, 2002, BY THE

RESPONDENT, FOUND AT ANNX-A AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

HC-KAR

2. The memo is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE

JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead