Karnataka High Court
MFA/5948/2021 of SMT. SEEMA NAMBIAR Vs SRI SRIDHAR GOVINDAN on 1 October 2026
2026:KHC:54832
CNR: KAHC010408672021 NC: 2026:KHC:54832-DB MFA No. 5948 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5948 OF 2021 (GW)
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5948 OF 2021 (GW)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SEEMA NAMBIAR
D/O K P DAMODARAN
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.112 III MAIN
1ST STAGE, II PHASE
BEML LAYOUT
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
BENGALURU 560 098
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJ, FOR
SMT. GEETHA DEVI M P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI SRIDHAR GOVINDAN
S/O SHRI V G KUTTY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT NO.11
PRIYAM CHAITANYA GREEN FORD
PHASE 2 SEEGEHALLI
BENGALURU 560 067
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. VINUTA YATTINAHALLI FOR
SMT. RAMA R IYER FOR RESPONDENT)
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
Page 1 of 2
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47(a) OF GUARDIAN
AND WARDS ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2021
PASSED IN G AND WC NO.260/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE IV
ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE,
FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU,
PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 7
AND 17 OF THE G AND WC ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present appeal has been filed under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, calling in question the judgment and decree dated 21.09.2021 passed in G. & W.C. No.260/2013 by the IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru.
2. The ward has attained the age of majority, i.e., 18 years. Since he has attained the age of majority, the question of continuation of guardianship does not survive for
HC-KAR
consideration. Consequently, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
RKA CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…