Karnataka High Court

MFA/5948/2021 of SMT. SEEMA NAMBIAR Vs SRI SRIDHAR GOVINDAN on 1 October 2026

2026:KHC:54832

CNR: KAHC010408672021 NC: 2026:KHC:54832-DB MFA No. 5948 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5948 OF 2021 (GW)

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5948 OF 2021 (GW)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. SEEMA NAMBIAR

D/O K P DAMODARAN

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

R/AT NO.112 III MAIN

1ST STAGE, II PHASE

BEML LAYOUT

RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR

BENGALURU 560 098

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. BASAVARAJ, FOR

SMT. GEETHA DEVI M P., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI SRIDHAR GOVINDAN

S/O SHRI V G KUTTY

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

R/AT NO.11

PRIYAM CHAITANYA GREEN FORD

PHASE 2 SEEGEHALLI

BENGALURU 560 067

…RESPONDENT

(BY SMT. VINUTA YATTINAHALLI FOR

SMT. RAMA R IYER FOR RESPONDENT)

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

Page 1 of 2

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47(a) OF GUARDIAN

AND WARDS ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2021

PASSED IN G AND WC NO.260/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE IV

ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE,

FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU,

PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 7

AND 17 OF THE G AND WC ACT.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, calling in question the judgment and decree dated 21.09.2021 passed in G. & W.C. No.260/2013 by the IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru.

2. The ward has attained the age of majority, i.e., 18 years. Since he has attained the age of majority, the question of continuation of guardianship does not survive for

HC-KAR

consideration. Consequently, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.

3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE

RKA CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead