Karnataka High Court
WP/6738/2026 of SRI CHAITHANYA SCHOOL Vs SMT SHOBHA M on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010347702026 NC: 2026:KHC:54841 WP No. 15971 of 2026 C/W WP No. 6738 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 15971 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 15971 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
C/W
WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
IN WP No. 15971/2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI CHAITHANYA SCHOOL
REPRESENTED BY ITS AGM
SRI. SUNIL
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/A NO. 91, OLD NO.55,
NEAR SRI CHAITHANYA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, HUSKUR POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE 560 099.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. KEERTHANA A BAGALWADI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI ARNAV A BAGALWADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. C KAMLESH BABU
S/O CHANDRA SHEKAR S.,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/A NO.99 SAI NILAYA,
BILLAPUARA VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA POST,
Digitally signed
by VINUTHA B
S
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE 562 125
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAMESH S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12/02/2026 PASSED IN IA NO.1/26
BY THE LEARNED IV THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, BANGALORE RURAL IN OS NO.135/2026 A COPY OF
WHICH IS HEREIN PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AS ILLEGAL
AND VOID ETC.
IN WP NO. 6738/2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI CHAITHANYA SCHOOL
REPRESENTED BY ITS AGM
SRI. SUNIL
R/A NO 91, OLD NO. 55,
NEAR SRI CHAITHANYA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, HUSKUR POST, SARJAPURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE 560 099
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. KEERTHANA A BAGALWADI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI ARNAV A BAGALWADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT SHOBHA M
W/O SRI S RAGHU
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/A 18/1, LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA,
HEELAIGE CROSS, RAMAREDDY LAYOUT,
CHANDAPURA POST, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE 560 099
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAMESH S., ADVOCATE)
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER DATED 12.02.2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED
IVTH ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, BANGALORE
RURAL IN OS NO.132/2026 A COPY OF WHICH IS HEREIN
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE A AS ILLEGAL AND VOID.
THESE
PETITIONS
COMING ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE
THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
These writ petitions are filed challening the orders dated 12.02.2026, whereby the applications filed by the respondent-plaintiff in the respective original suits under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, CPC), came to be allowed, and an ex parte temporary injunction was granted restraining the petitioner herein from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, after service of notice, the petitioner has
HC-KAR
entered appearance before the Court and has filed objections.
3. In that view of the matter, it would suffice to direct the Trial Court to consider I.A. No.1 expeditiously. In that light, the following:
O R D E R
(i) Writ petitions are disposed of.
(ii) Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose of I.A. No.1 pending filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC within one month from the next date of hearing.
(iii) Till consideration of the pending applications, the interim directions passed by this Court in the respective writ petitions, shall continue to operate.
(iv) Both the counsels are at liberty to seek advancement before the Trial Court for
HC-KAR
consideration of pending applications as directed above.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18