Karnataka High Court
WP/28170/2026 of SMT. MEENA RAVEESH Vs UCO BANK on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010620032026 NC: 2026:KHC:54860 WP No. 28170 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28170 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MEENA RAVEESH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O SRI G
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 28170 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MEENA RAVEESH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
W/O SRI G A RAVEESH
RSIDING AT NO 414,
CHIKKASANDRA , T DASARAHALLI POST,
BANGALORE - 560057
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UCO BANK
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/
CHIEF MANAGER,
9THMAIN,3RD BLOCK,
JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560011
…RESPONDENT
(BY MS. CHITHRA NIRMALA P.,ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT BANK TO ACCEPT
THE PROPOSAL OF THE PETITIONER TO CLOSE THE LOAN
ACCOUNT BEARING NO.12510400000224 AND AS MENTIONED
AT ANNEXURE-J.
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:
"a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent bank to consider the representation dated 19/08/2026 produced at Annexure-F given to the Respondent Bank for regularization of the loan account.
b) Grant any other relief as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding costs, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking consideration of the representation dated 19.08.2026 (Annexure-F to the writ petition), whereunder the petitioner has requested the respondent - Bank for regularization of the housing loan availed by the petitioner.
3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that in reply to the notice dated 30.07.2026 issued by the respondent - Bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation
HC-KAR
and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20021 (Annexure-L to the writ petition), the petitioner has submitted the said reply/representation dated 19.08.2026 requesting for regularization of his account. The said reply not having been responded, the present writ petition is filed.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent - Bank, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has availed a housing loan, consequent to which, the petitioner has put up construction of a commercial complex and has let out portions of the commercial building for various commercial activities. Hence, it is the contention of the bank that the petitioner having utilized the property in question for commercial purposes, the question of regularization of a housing loan does not arise.
5. In any event, the bank having initiated measures under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, it is open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies under the provisions of the said Act.
1 Hereinafter referred to as 'SARFAESI Act'
HC-KAR
6. Subject to the aforementioned, the writ petition stands dismissed.
7. Pending IAs., if any, stand disposed of.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
ND List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42