Karnataka High Court
WP/7067/2025 of M/S PROLIGHTS SYSTEMS Vs CANARA BANK on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010163952025 NC: 2026:KHC:54904 WP No. 7067 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.7067 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. M/S PROLIGHT SYSTEMS BY ITS PROP CONCERN MR.
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010163952025
NC: 2026:KHC:54904
WP No. 7067 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.7067 OF 2025 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S PROLIGHT SYSTEMS
BY ITS PROP CONCERN MR. DESHPAL K.S.,
S/O LATE K.S. SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.22, 6TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN, GANESHA BLOCK,
MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-560086.
2.
MR. DESHPAL K.S.
S/O LATE K.S. SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.43,
SFHS, NANDINI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-560096.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
CANARA BANK
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER
CHITRAPUR MUTT COMPLEX,
MALLESHWARAM 15TH CROSS,
BENGALURU-560055
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. SOWBHAGYA N.A., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010163952025
NC: 2026:KHC:54904
WP No. 7067 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
POSSESSION NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT BANK DATED
17.01.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B IN THE RESPECT OF
SCHEDULE PROPERTY; QUASH THE SALE NOTICE DATED
03.02.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY RESPONDENT
BANK
IN
RESPECT
OF
SCHEDULE
PROPERTY
REF:
CNRB/0682/PROLIGHT/SN/2024-25.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the petition has been rendered infructuous as loan account has been closed.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- ________________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24