Karnataka High Court
WP/26269/2026 of SRI.MANJEGOWDA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010582512026 NC: 2026:KHC:54829 WP No. 26269 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 26269 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.MANJEGOWDA S/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 26269 OF 2026 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI.MANJEGOWDA
S/O CHIKKEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT HOOVINAHALLI VILLAGE,
HONGERE POST, SHANTIGRAMA VILLAGE AND
HOBLI HASSAN TALUK AND
DISTRICT-573220.
2.
SRI. PUTTARAJU H M
S/O MANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT HOOVINAHALLI VILLAGE,
HONGERE POST,
SHANTIGRAMA VILLAGE AND HOBLI
HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573220.
3.
SRI DHARMA H M
S/O MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT HOOVINAHALLI VILLAGE,
HONGERE POST,
SHANTIGRAMA VILLAGE AND
HOBLI HASSAN TALUK AND
Digitally
signed by
VANAMALA
N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
DISTRICT-573220.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. DHIRAJ A K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND
PANCHAYATRAJ, 3RD FLOOR,
M.S. BUILDING, 3RD GATE,
DR. AMBEDKAR BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
TALUK PANCHAYAT,
B.M. ROAD, N.R.CIRCLE,
HASSAN 573201.
3.
PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
SHANTIGRAMA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
SHANTIGRAMA VILLAGE AND
HOBLI HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573220.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.BOPANNA BELLIAPPA., AGA FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.08.2026 IN NO. TA PAM
HA/SI
(5)/GRA.
TA.
KA.
GA
OTTUVARI/SHANTIGRAMA/2026-27
(TALUK
HC-KAR
PANCHAYAT
HASSAN/C(5)/GRAMA.
THANA.
LAND.
ENCROACHMENT/SHANTIGRAMA/2026-27) PASSED BY
EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAUAT, HASSAN (R2)
DIRECTING REMOVAL OF SHED OF PETITIONERS
WITHIN 15 DAYS AT THEIR OWN COST AND REPORT
THE SAME TO THE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PRODUCED
AT ANNX-F.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo which reads as under:
“That the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the Executive Officer, Taluk Panchayath passed under the provisions of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Removal of Obstructions and Encroachment) Rules, 2011 in this writ petition. Since the order impugned is an appealable order under Rule 5 of the said Rules, the petitioner has subsequently filed an appeal before the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayat in Appeal No.01/2026-27 and
HC-KAR
sought for an interim prayer. In the circumstance stated above, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty to prosecute the appeal before the competent authority keeping open all contentions and directing the appellate authority to consider the interim prayer in the interest of justice.
The memo is accepted and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
SA Ct:sr