Karnataka High Court
WP/11751/2026 of SRI KANTILAL Vs RAMADA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010254502026 NC: 2026:KHC:54567 WP No. 11751 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 11751 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI KANTILAL S/O. SRI JUGRAJ JI VED MUTHA AGED ABOUT 66
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 11751 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI KANTILAL
S/O. SRI JUGRAJ JI VED MUTHA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.5/41,
NOOTAN ENCLAVE,
KRISHNA RAJENDRA ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI,
BANGALORE-560 004.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PARASMAL B @ PARAS JAIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAMADA
BY WYNDHAM
SY. NO.45/2, SALKYA, HONNENAHALLI,
DODDABALLAPURA ROAD, YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE - 560064.
2.
HOTEL THE SAI LEELA,
SY. NO.3/1, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI,
YELAHANKA,
4TH MILE ON DODDABALLAPURA ROAD,
YELAHANKA, BANGALORE - 560064.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN
THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR SUCH OTHER ORDER OR WRIT
Digitally signed by
JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
INTER ALIA DIRECTING THE IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, (CCH-5), TO DISPOSE OF
EXECUTION CASE NO.2811/2023 ANNEXURE-B WITHIN 3
MONTHS WITHOUT GRANTING ANY ADJOURNMENTS, STRICTLY
FOLLOWING THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE HON’BLE
SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF IN RAHUL S. SHAH V.
JINENDRA KUMAR GANDHI, (2021) 6 SCC ANNAWC-D 418
ANNEXURE-D AND PERIYAMMAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND
ORS. V. V. RAJAMANI AND ANR. ETC., 2025 INSC 329, AND
FURTHER PRAYS FOR SUCH OTHER ORDER AS THIS HON’BLE
COURT
DEEM
FIT
TO
GRANT
IN
THE
FACTS
AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The matter is coming up for preliminary hearing. Learned counsel for the petitioner/Decree Holder submits that the suit filed by the petitioner was decreed on 04.03.2023. By virtue of the judgment passed by the trial court, there is a decree in favour of the petitioner for a sum of Rs.13,37,870/- payable by the defendants. The execution case was filed by the petitioner/ Decree Holder on 16.11.2023 and vakalath was filed on behalf of the Judgment Debtors on 03.02.2024.
HC-KAR
2. Learned counsel submits that the Executing Court has been adjourning the matter at every request made by the Judgment Debtor. Learned counsel submits that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendrakumar Gandhi – (2021) 6 SCC 418 has directed that the execution petitions should be disposed of within a period of six months of their institution. Learned counsel submits that the prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the learned IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH
to dispose of Execution Case No.2811/2023 within a period of three months, without granting any adjournments.
3. In view of the above, and having regard to the prayer made by the petitioner/Decree Holder, this writ petition is disposed of without issuance of notice to the respondent/Judgment Debtor, having regard to the innocuous prayer made by the petitioner. The
HC-KAR
IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH 5) is hereby directed to take up the matter in Execution Case No.2811/2023 and dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six months, without giving scope for further grievance at the hands of the Decree Holder. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT:SM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7