Karnataka High Court
WP/7472/2023 of MRS. BHAGYALAKSHMI VENKATESH REDDY Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010170142023 NC: 2026:KHC:54886 WP No. 7472 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 7472 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MRS. BHAGYALAKSHMI VENKATESH REDDY W/O. SRI VENKATESH
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 7472 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MRS. BHAGYALAKSHMI VENKATESH REDDY
W/O. SRI VENKATESH REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2, SLV PLAZA,
KUNDANAHALLI GATE,
MARATHAHALLI POST,
BANGALORE - 560 037.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHAILESH KUMAR R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY THE CCB, CHAMARAJPET,
BANGALORE SHO,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AT BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
MR. SHAJI UL MULK
AGED MAJOR,
C/O P3, HAMRIYAH BUSINESS CENTRE,
HAMRIYAH FREE ZONE,
SHARJAH, U.A.E.
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
3.
MR. ARBAD AHMED KHAN
S/O. NAWAB MASOOD AHMED KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT NO.21, ALXANDRIA STREET,
RICHMOND TOWN,
BENGALURU - 560 025.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF
THE CR.PC PRAYING TO DIRECT FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION
BY A HIGHER AUTHORITIES IN FIR NO.216/2020 REGISTERED
WITH THE R2 AND INVESTIGATED BY THE R1 PENDING
BEFORE THE HONBLE IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. Memo reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner respectfully submits that the petitioner may be permitted
HC-KAR
to withdraw the above petition and the same may be disposed of as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Placing the memo on record, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15