Karnataka High Court
WP/14377/2021 of SRI SATISH K G Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010283682021 NC: 2026:KHC:54887 WP No. 14377 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 14377 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SATISH K.G, SON OF LATE K.S. GOVINDARAJU,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 14377 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SATISH K.G,
SON OF LATE K.S. GOVINDARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
2.
SMT. K.S. SHOBHA
WIFE OF K.G. SATISH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
3.
SMT. V.T. LAKSHMI
WIFE OF NITHIN S. KASAL
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE
RESIDING AT NO.14, MEI COLONY,
LAGGERE MAIN, PEENYA 3RD STAGE,
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY RAJGOPALA NAGARA PS,
REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER
BENGALURU - 560 086.
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SRI. K.G. RANGANATH
S/O. K.S. GOVINDARAJ
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
3.
SRI. K.G. PRABHAKAR
S/O K.S. GOVINDARAJ
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
4.
SRI. K.G. SURENDRA
S/O. K.S. GOVINDARAJ
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.14,
MEI COLONY, LAGGERE MAIN,
PEENYA 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 058.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF THE CR.PC
PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT NO.8559/2019
DTD. 9.7.2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL
CHIEF
METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE
AT
BENGALURU
ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. None appears for the petitioners.
2. No steps were taken for issue of notice vide Court Orders dated 11.09.2026 and 16.09.2026 and earlier Order dated 23.08.2021.
3. However, in the interest of justice, this Court imposed cost of Rs.500/- and granted one more opportunity for the petitioners to pay the process fee. But despite such indulgence shown by this Court, cost not paid nor the process be paid.
4. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5