Karnataka High Court

WP/29331/2025 of SRI GURU RAGHAVENDRA SAHAKARA BANK TEVANIDHARARA SANGHA (REGD) Vs THE ADMINISTRATOR on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010634192025 NC: 2026:KHC:54874 WP No. 29331 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 29331 OF 2025 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI GURU RAGHAVENDRA SAHAKARA BANK TEVANIDHARARA

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 29331 OF 2025 (GM-KSR)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI GURU RAGHAVENDRA SAHAKARA BANK

TEVANIDHARARA SANGHA (REGD)

REGISTRED ASSOCIATION UNDER KARNATAKA

SOCIETIES ACT, 1960

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

SRL. G K GURURAJA RAO,

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

87, R K SWAMJI ROAD, 1ST BLOCK, THYAGARAJANAGAR, BENGALURU 560028.

2.

V HARISH

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

S/O A VENKATARAMAIAH,

NO 10 OLD NO. 25 SHANTALAYA FIRST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN ROAD TUNGANADI ROAD, DATTATREYA NAGAR HOSAKEREHALLI, VTC BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE SOUTH- 560085.

3.

B K MOHAN KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

S/O D V KRISHNAMURTHY

11, MANJUSHREE NEW KEMPEGOWDA

LAYOUT NEAR BIG BAZAR KATHRIGUPPE,

BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BANGALORE

SOUTH BANASHANKARI III STAGE

BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560085.

4.

SARVOTHAMA RAO P N.

AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,

S/O P V NANARAO

NO. 183/3 1ST FLOOR 11TH

CROSS 3RD BLOCK THYAGARAJA

HC-KAR

NAGAR BANGALORE SOUTH -560028.

5.

ROOPA G RAO

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

W/O GURURAJA RAO G K,

NO 3/8 2ND FLOOR SURAJ KRUPA,

35TH A CROSS 15TH MAIN, 4TH T BLOCK

JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE- 560041.

PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. HIRAN KRISHNASWAMY.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE ADMINISTRATOR

SRI. GURU RAGHAVENDRA SAHAKARA

BANK NIYAMITA,

NO.15, SUBBARAMA CHETTY

ROAD, NETKALLAPPA CIRCLE,

BASAVANAGUDI,

BENGALURU 560 004.

2.

THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

SOCIETIES, NO 1, ALL ASKER ROAD,

BENGALURU 560 052.

3.

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,

REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, 10/3/8,

NRUPATHUNGA RD, OPP ST,

NUNEGUNDLAPALLI, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560001.

RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL.,ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S., AGA FOR R2; SRI. PRADEEP S. SAWKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R3.)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

CONSITITUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO INCLUDE

THE REGISTERED MORTGAGE DEEDS MARKED AS i) ANNX-T

(DOCUMENT BEARING NO. BSK-1-10721-2019-20 REGISTERED ON

20.11.2019) AND ETC,.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:

"1) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to include the registered mortgage deeds marked as: i. Annexure-T (Document bearing No.BSK-1- 10721-2019-20 registered on 20.11.2019); ii. Annexure-T1 (Document bearing No.CMP-1- 05657-2019-20 registered on 13.11.2019); iii. Annexure-T2 (Document bearing No.BSK-1- 11251-2019-20 dt 26.11.2019); iv. Annexure-T3 (Document bearing No.BHM-1- 07257-2019-20 registered on 14.11.2019); v. Annexure-T4 (Document bearing No.VNJ-1- 08664-2017-18 registered on 15.12.2017); vi. Annexure-T5 (Document bearing No.CNP-1- 05666-2019-20 registered on 13.11.2019); vii. Annexure-T6 (Document bearing No.JAY-1- 07288-2019-20 registered on 18.11.2019), in the Security Register and to consequently bring the assets mentioned in the said Mortgage Deeds into the books of account;

2) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representations made on 28.07.2026 and 13.09.2025 enclosed herewith as Annexures V1, V2 and V3;

3) Issue a writ in the nature of a mandamus directing the respondents to maintain the Security Register as recommended by the Auditors;

4) Issue any other direction deemed fit and necessary by this Hon'ble Court."

HC-KAR

2. It is the case of the petitioners that respondent No.1 - Administrator of the Bank in question during the process of the liquidation proceedings has not considered various properties which are the assets of the Bank in as much as various mortgage deeds registered in favour of the Bank have not been taken into consideration.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that representations dated 28.07.2025 and 13.09.2025 (Annexures- V1 and V2 to the writ petition respectively) have been given to respondent No.1 as well as to respondent No.3 - Reserve Bank of India.

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the representations of the petitioners would be considered within a period of four weeks. It is further submitted that the said time is required since the mortgage deeds, details of which have been furnished in the representations have to be verified and the properties in question have to be identified before any further action is taken on the said representations.

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that further mortgage deeds of properties have come

HC-KAR

to the knowledge of the petitioners who are the depositors of the Bank during the pendency of the present writ petition. The petitioners seek leave to give another representation to respondent No.1 furnishing details of the same.

6. In view of the aforementioned, the petitioners are permitted to give another representation to respondent No.1 furnishing details / particulars of any further mortgage deeds of the properties within a period of two weeks from date. Respondent No.1 shall consider the representations dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure-V to the writ petition) as well as the representation which shall be given by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible in any event within a period of six weeks from date.

7. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforementioned terms.

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

PNV - List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead