Karnataka High Court
CRP/119/2026 of A P VANAJA Vs SMT K K APOORVA @ SATHYA PRIYADARSHINI on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010107232026 NC: 2026:KHC:54590 CRP No. 119 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 119 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. A.P.VANAJA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, W/O
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010107232026
NC: 2026:KHC:54590
CRP No. 119 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 119 OF 2026 (IO)
BETWEEN:
1.
A.P.VANAJA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
W/O LATE K.K. RAJAN,
RESIDING AT NO.5,
GARVEBHAVIPALYA,
HONGASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 068.
2.
RAJESH R,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
S/O LATE K.K. RAJAN,
RESIDING AT NO.5,
GARVEBHAVIPALYA,
HONGASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 068.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. K.K.APOORVA @
SATHYA PRIYADARSHINI,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
D/O LATE V. KRISHNAMURTHY,
RESIDING AT NO.9, 1ST FLOOR,
VENUKAMBA NILAYA,
SRIRAMNAGAR,
GARBEBHVIPALYA,
HONGASANDRA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 068.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010107232026
NC: 2026:KHC:54590
CRP No. 119 of 2026
(BY SRI.PAVAN KUMAR YARAGANAVI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 9.01.2026 PASSED ON IA NO.10 IN OS
NO.8212/2024, ON THE FILE OF XI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY., DISMISSING THE
IA NO.10 FILED UNDER ARTICLE 58 OF THE LIMITATION ACT
R/W ORDER VII RULE 11(d) AND SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR
REJECTION OF PLAINT/DISMISSAL OF THE SUIT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the original suit itself is disposed of. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
2. Pending I.As., if any, in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 *AK