Karnataka High Court

CRP/119/2026 of A P VANAJA Vs SMT K K APOORVA @ SATHYA PRIYADARSHINI on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010107232026 NC: 2026:KHC:54590 CRP No. 119 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 119 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. A.P.VANAJA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, W/O

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010107232026

NC: 2026:KHC:54590

CRP No. 119 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 119 OF 2026 (IO)

BETWEEN:

1.

A.P.VANAJA,

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

W/O LATE K.K. RAJAN,

RESIDING AT NO.5,

GARVEBHAVIPALYA,

HONGASANDRA MAIN ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 068.

2.

RAJESH R,

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

S/O LATE K.K. RAJAN,

RESIDING AT NO.5,

GARVEBHAVIPALYA,

HONGASANDRA MAIN ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 068.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. K.K.APOORVA @

SATHYA PRIYADARSHINI,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

D/O LATE V. KRISHNAMURTHY,

RESIDING AT NO.9, 1ST FLOOR,

VENUKAMBA NILAYA,

SRIRAMNAGAR,

GARBEBHVIPALYA,

HONGASANDRA ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 068.

…RESPONDENT

Digitally signed

by SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010107232026

NC: 2026:KHC:54590

CRP No. 119 of 2026

(BY SRI.PAVAN KUMAR YARAGANAVI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST

THE ORDER DATED 9.01.2026 PASSED ON IA NO.10 IN OS

NO.8212/2024, ON THE FILE OF XI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL

AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY., DISMISSING THE

IA NO.10 FILED UNDER ARTICLE 58 OF THE LIMITATION ACT

R/W ORDER VII RULE 11(d) AND SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR

REJECTION OF PLAINT/DISMISSAL OF THE SUIT.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the original suit itself is disposed of. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

2. Pending I.As., if any, in this petition shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 *AK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead