Karnataka High Court
RP/514/2024 of SRI RAJENDRA Vs SRI N S ANAND on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS REVIEW PETITION NO. 514 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAJENDRA, S/O LATE LAKSHMIDEVI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
REVIEW PETITION NO. 514 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. RAJENDRA,
S/O LATE LAKSHMIDEVI,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/A NO.3, 20TH CROSS,
NEAR BAJANE MANE,
EJIPURA, VIVEKANAGAR POST,
BENGALURU - 560 047.
2.
SMT. MUNITHAYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
D/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
R/AT NO.166,
PANATHUR DINNE,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
BANGALORE - 560 087.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. T.K.RAJAGOPALA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. N.S.ANAND,
S/O N.C.SUBBARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT NO.4027/144,
7TH CROSS, KANAKAPURA ROAD,
Digitally signed by
JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 082.
2.
SRI. N.S.NARENDRA,
S/O N.C.SUBBARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT NO.4027/144,
7TH CROSS, KANAKAPURA ROAD,
7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 011.
3.
SRI. MUNIVENKATASWAMY,
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
4.
SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA,
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
5.
SRI. NAGARAJU,
S/O KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
6.
SRI. MUNIRAJU,
S/O KRISHNAPPA,
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
7.
SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA,
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
8.
SRI. KANAKAPPA,
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
9.
SRI. K. MANJUNATH,
S/O KANAKAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI,
ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU -560 100.
10.
SRI. K. RAVI,
S/O KANAKAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
HC-KAR
11.
SRI. K. NAGARAJ,
S/O KANAKAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
12.
SRI. GOVINDAPPA,
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILALGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
13.
SRI. G. BABU,
S/O GOVINDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
14.
SRI. G. NANDISH,
S/O GOVINDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY MS.PREETI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
R2 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER R1
(GPA COPY FURNISHED A/W VK);
SRI.G.V.P.DAS, ADVOCATE FOR R12-R14;
SRI.LINGAPPA B.T., ADVOCATE FOR R5;
R7 - MUNISHAMAPPA SERVED;
HC-KAR
R8 - KANAKAPPA SERVED;
R9 - K.MANJUNATH SERVED;
R10- K RAVI SERVED)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE
1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO A.PASS
AN ORDER REVIEWING THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2024 BY
THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P. NO.23099/2024 AT ANNEXURE-A
AND TO ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION AND TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER PASSED IN W.P. NO.23099/2024.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Insofar as the note put up in the cause list is concerned, the attention of the office is directed to the order dated 28.11.2025, whereby this Court has already held that the review petition stands abated as against respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6.
2. Sri. Abhinav R., learned counsel has entered appearance for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. This review petition has been filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the writ petition to review the order dated 18.09.2024. However, this Court finds that
HC-KAR
there are no tenable grounds raised by the petitioners to review the order passed by this Court. To a pointed question put to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to what is the error apparent on the face of the record which seeks a review of the order, the learned counsel for the petitioners has no answer.
4. Consequently, the review petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20