Karnataka High Court
WP/30902/2026 of MR. SYED MOHAMMED ADIL PASHA KHADRI Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010678902026 NC: 2026:KHC:54418 WP No. 30902 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 30902 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MR. SYED MOHAMMED ADIL PASHA KHADRI AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 30902 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
MR. SYED MOHAMMED ADIL PASHA KHADRI
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
SON OF LATE JANAB SYED
MOHAMMED AKHIL PASHA KHADRI,
SAJJADANASHEEN
DARGAH SYED MOHAMMED AKHIL SHAH KHADRI,
CHANNAPATANA TOWN,
CHANNAPATANA 562160
SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED.
PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUBHASH SRINIVASA RANGACHAR.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT,
RAMANAGARA 562159.
2.
THE CHANNAPATANA TOWN POLICE
CHANNAPATANA TOWN
CHANNAPATANA 562160.
RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HARISHA. A.S.,AGA)
HC-KAR
THIS
WP
IS
FILED
UNDER
ARTICLE
OF
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA
PRAYING
TO
DIRECT
THE
RESPONDENTS TO ASSIST THE PETITIONER TO SECURE
POSSESSION OF THE SUIT DARGAH HAZARATH AKHIL SHAH
KHADRI COMMONLY KNOWN AS BADA MAKHAN SITUATED IN
CHANAPATNA TOWN AND PROVIDE PROTECTION TO ENABLE
HIM TO CONDUCT DAILY AND ANNUAL RITUALS OF THE
DARGAH VIDE ANNX-H AND ETC,.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking for following reliefs: "a) Directing the respondents to assist the petitioner to secure possession of the Suit Dargah Hazarath Akhil Shah Khadri commonly known as 'Bada Makhan' Chanapatna Town and provide protection to enable him to conduct daily and annual rituals of the Dargah vide Annexure-H;
b) Directing the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner during Sandal and Urus rituals vide annexure-H;
c) Such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice."
2. The petitioner having succeeded in the suit (OS.No.92/1988) and in the First Appeal (RA.No.7/2020) and
HC-KAR
other connected matters), having made a representation on 10.09.2026 (Annexure-H to the writ petition) to respondent No.1 - Superintendent of Police, he is before this Court seeking for the aforementioned reliefs for providing Police protection to take physical possession.
3. In this context, it is pertinent to note that the order passed by the First Appellate Court was set aside by this Court vide judgment dated 16.12.2024 passed in RSA.No.1004/2023 and other connected matters. The same was assailed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.4174-4177/2026. The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 02.04.2026 set aside the judgment dated 16.12.2024 passed by this Court in the Second Appeal, restored the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court and First Appellate Court and remanded the matter to this Court for adjudication of the Second Appeal on its merits. Pending consideration of Second Appeal, the representation dated 10.09.2026 has been filed consequent to which the present writ petition is filed.
4. It is clear and forthcoming from the aforementioned factual matrix that civil rights of parties are involved. In the
HC-KAR
event, the petitioner is desirous of implementing the order passed by the Trial Court, it is open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The present case is not one where the extra-ordinary discretionary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to be invoked. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
5. This order will not preclude the parties from availing remedies in accordance with law.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25