Karnataka High Court
WP/34057/2025 of SMT. ZOYA ANISH Vs SRI. ABDUL KHADEER on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010731402025 NC: 2026:KHC:54637 WP No. 34057 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 34057 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. ZOYA ANISH D/O MR. MOHAMMED ANISH, AGED ABOUT 26
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 34057 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. ZOYA ANISH
D/O MR. MOHAMMED ANISH,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.91,
REGENCY CORNER, MOSQUE ROAD,
JERMAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 005.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. ABDUL KHADEER
S/O LATE ABDUL KHUDDUS,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESIDING AT FF-102,
FIRST FLOOR,
WESTBURY RESIDENCY, NO.235,
15TH STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU - 560 043.
2.
M/S. A.J. DEVELOPERS,
PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
MR. A. AJMAL, S/O S.A. AHMED,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
OFFICE AT NO.7,
Digitally signed by
JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AIYAPPA TEMPLE ROAD,
ARAVINDNAGAR, LINGARAJAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560 084.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING TO THE
LEARNED XXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-20), TO EXPEDITIOUSLY
DISPOSE OF IA NOS.1 TO 3 IN OS NO.3962/2022, WITHIN A
TIME-BOUND PERIOD AS MAY BE FIXED BY THIS HON'BLE
COURT IN TERMS OF THE ORDER DATED 29/04/2025 AT
ANNX-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.09.2026, stating that the petitioner and respondents have mutually settled their matter out of Court and, therefore, the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
HC-KAR
2. Memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21