Karnataka High Court

WP/34057/2025 of SMT. ZOYA ANISH Vs SRI. ABDUL KHADEER on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010731402025 NC: 2026:KHC:54637 WP No. 34057 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 34057 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. ZOYA ANISH D/O MR. MOHAMMED ANISH, AGED ABOUT 26

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 34057 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SMT. ZOYA ANISH

D/O MR. MOHAMMED ANISH,

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.91,

REGENCY CORNER, MOSQUE ROAD,

JERMAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 005.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. ABDUL KHADEER

S/O LATE ABDUL KHUDDUS,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

RESIDING AT FF-102,

FIRST FLOOR,

WESTBURY RESIDENCY, NO.235,

15TH STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT,

BENGALURU - 560 043.

2.

M/S. A.J. DEVELOPERS,

PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN,

REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR,

MR. A. AJMAL, S/O S.A. AHMED,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

OFFICE AT NO.7,

Digitally signed by

JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

AIYAPPA TEMPLE ROAD,

ARAVINDNAGAR, LINGARAJAPURA,

BENGALURU - 560 084.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING TO THE

LEARNED XXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-20), TO EXPEDITIOUSLY

DISPOSE OF IA NOS.1 TO 3 IN OS NO.3962/2022, WITHIN A

TIME-BOUND PERIOD AS MAY BE FIXED BY THIS HON'BLE

COURT IN TERMS OF THE ORDER DATED 29/04/2025 AT

ANNX-A AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.09.2026, stating that the petitioner and respondents have mutually settled their matter out of Court and, therefore, the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

HC-KAR

2. Memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead