Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9201/2024 of SRI. MUNIRAJU Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010516972024 NC: 2026:KHC:54451 CRL.P No. 9201 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9201 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O MUNICHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9201 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUNIRAJU
S/O MUNICHANNEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
RESIDING AT OBALAHALLI
VILLAGE, NANJANGUD HOBLI
HOSKOTE TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 122
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. THIPPESWAMY T, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
NANDAGUDI POLICE STATION
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560001
2.
MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE KONDAPPA
AGED ABOUT MAJOR
R/AT OBALAHALLI VILLAGE
NANDAGUDI HOBLI
HOSKOTE TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562114
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
5 MILLERS ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 052
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME
NO.0166/2023
REGISTERED
WITH
NANDAGUDI
POLICE
STATION, BENGALURU DISTRICT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF
HONOURABLE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 307 OF IPC
(DOCUMENT NO. 1 AND 2), IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER
CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This petition was listed on 11.09.2026 for non-furnishing of the process fee for issuance of notice to respondent No.2. On that day, the learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the needful is stated to have been done. On such submission, this Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 if process fee is paid.
Today, the matter is listed for non-furnishing of process fee and the office note reveals that no process fee has been
HC-KAR
paid. As such, it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8