Karnataka High Court
CRP/507/2026 of MRS. PARVATHAMMA Vs LATE SUBBANNA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010369322026 NC: 2026:KHC:54589 CRP No. 507 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 507 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 507 OF 2026 (IO)
BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. PARVATHAMMA,
W/O LATE SHIVARUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
2.
MR.BABU,
S/O LATE SHIVARUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
3.
MRS.NAGAVENI,
D/O LATE SHIVARUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
4.
MRS. SHANKARAPPA,
S/O LATE SHIVARUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
5.
MRS.SHIVANANDA @ SHIVANNA,
S/O LATE PUTTANNA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
6.
MRS. NAGENDRA,
S/O LATE PUTTANNA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
7.
MRS. NAGARATHNA,
S/O LATE PUTTANNA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
CHIKKANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 125.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA M.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
LATE SUBBANNA,
S/O DODDAKAVERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS,
DEAD REPRESENTED BY
HIS LEGAL HEIRS
2.
MR.RAJASHEKARAIAH S.,
S/O SRI. SUBBANNA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
3.
MRS. NEELAMMA,
W/O LATE PUTTANNA,
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
4.
MR. NANJUNDAPPA,
S/O LATE PUTTANNA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
5.
MR. JAGADISH,
S/O LATE PUTTANNA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
HC-KAR
6.
MRS.JAYAMMA,
W/O LATE NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
7.
MR. REVANNA,
S/O LATE NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
8.
MR. NANJUNDAPPA,
S/O LATE NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
9.
MR. PUTTARAJU,
S/O LATE NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
10.
MR. N. SHIVANANDA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
S/O LATE NANJAPPA,
NOS.1 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT
CHIKKANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA HOBLI,
ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 125.
11.
MR. R.T. RAMESH,
S/O LATE R. THIMMAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
12.
MR. C.R. CHANDAN,
S/O SRI R. T. RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
HC-KAR
13.
MR. PRAPULLA REDDY,
D/O SRI R. T. RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
14.
MR. T. RAGHU REDDY,
S/O LATE R. THIMMAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
15.
MR. YASHO RAJATH REDDY,
S/O SRI T. RAGHUREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
16.
MR. R. AMULYA REDDY,
D/O SRI T. RAGHUREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
NOS. 11 TO 16 ARE
RESIDING AT CHANDAPURA VILLAGE,
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 125.
17.
MR. K. SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU,
S/O LATE NARASIMHULU NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1695, 5TH A CROSS,
2ND BLOCK, BSK I STAGE,
BANGALORE - 560 050.
18.
M/S.GLENLOCK PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,
(GLENMORE), REG. OFF SY. NO.58,
GOOLIMANGALA VILLAGE,
HUSKUR ROAD,
OPP. HOSUR ROAD,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
HC-KAR
BANGALORE - 560 100.
REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR,
MRS. KIRANMAZUMDAR SHAH.
19.
M/S. PIONIER DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD.,
REG. OFF 1ST FLOOR, 48,
I STAR BUILDING, 100 FEET ROAD,
4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
BANGALORE - 560 034.
REP. BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. M.Y. NARENDRA BALAJI.
20.
M/S.CATALYST TRUSTEESHIP LTD.,
REG. OFF GDA HOUSE,
FLAT NO.85, BHUSARI COLONY (RIGHT),
PAUD ROAD, POONA - 411 038,
MAHARASHTRA STATE.
REP. BY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
SRI S.A. PURUSHOTHAM.
21.
M/S.KRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS INDIA LTD.,
OFF NO.224, 3RD FLOOR,
SS COMPLEX, 14TH CROSS,
SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESWARAM,
BANGALORE - 560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO AFTER
PERUSING THE RECORDS, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
14.08.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.2 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT
NO.19 U/O VII RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC IN OS NO.
32/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC AT ANEKAL.
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners-plaintiffs has filed this CRP questioning an order passed under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC. The office has raised objection with regard to maintainability. The office objection with regard to maintainability is upheld and the petitioners are permitted to avail the appropriate remedy within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Accordingly, the following:
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate petition. ii. The petitioners shall have the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. iii. The Registry is directed to return all the documents by retaining the xerox copies.
HC-KAR
iv. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26