Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8702/2024 of SRI RAVINDRAN OTHAYOATH Vs STATE THROUGH KADUGODI POLICE STATION on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010469802024 NC: 2026:KHC:54466 CRL.P No. 8702 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8702 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI RAVINDRAN OTHAYOATH S/O KUNHAPPA NAIR OTHAYOATH
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8702 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI RAVINDRAN OTHAYOATH
S/O KUNHAPPA NAIR OTHAYOATH
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
EX-SERVICE MAN
R/A FLAT NO.E100
TARAPORE GREEN CHS
NEW LINK ROAD, ANDHERI WEST
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA - 400 053
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ABHIRAJ B CHENGTI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE THROUGH KADUGODI POLICE STATION
BENGALURU (REPRESENTED BY SPP)
2.
SMT AMBILI K.P
W/O BALAKRISHNAN
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/A VADAKKAN VETTIL,
PO ERUVATTY , KAPPUMEL,
ERUVATTY VILLAGE
THALASSERY TALUK
KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 642
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1,
SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE
FIR
REPORT
AT
ANNEXURE-E
IN
CR.NO.311/2024
OF
KADUGODI .P.S BEFORE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
(ACJM) BANGALORE, DATED 14.06.2024 FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 406,420,468,471 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONER BY
THE RESPONDENT NO.2.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to place all the documents which he relied on in this petition, as his defence, before the investigation officer.
2. The submission is accepted and taken on record.
3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to place all the documents he relied on in this petition, before the investigation officer as his defence within two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
HC-KAR
4. Upon such production, the investigation officer shall consider those documents in accordance with law before filing the final report.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14