Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9492/2024 of SMT. ROOPA Vs DHANARAJ L @ DHANU on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010424262024 NC: 2026:KHC:54462 CRL.P No. 9492 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9492 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. ROOPA W/O MUNIVENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS AK
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9492 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SMT. ROOPA
W/O MUNIVENKATAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
AK COLONY, MALEKOTE
KANAKAPURA TOWN
RAMANGARA
KARNATAKA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOVINDARAJU S.P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DHANARAJ L @ DHANU
S/O LATE M.H LINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT FORNT OF KABALAMMA
TEMPLE, MALEKOTE
KANAKAPURA TOWN
2.
MANJUNATHA N @ MANJU
S/O LATE NARSHIMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL
AK COLONY, MALEKOTE
KANAKAPURA TOWN
3.
MAHESH CHANDU @ MAHESH
LATE CHIKKARASAIAH
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
R/AT AK COLONY, MALEKOTE
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
KANAKAPURA TOWN
4.
SMT. HUCHAMMA
W/O LATE M.H LINGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
FRONT OF KABALAMMA TEMPLE
MALEKOTE, KANAKAPURA TOWN
5.
SMT. KRISHNAKUMARI
W/O LATE CHIKKANARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT AK COLONY
MALEKOTE
KANAKAPURA TOWN
6.
SRINIVASA M @ SEENA
S/O MUTHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT AK COLONY
MALEKOTE
KANAKAPURA TOWN
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 407 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 447
BNNS) PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE CASE IN C.C.NO.291/2024
PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA TO RANKING COMPETENT COURT OF THE
BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
HC-KAR
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9