Karnataka High Court
MFA/365/2022 of K.SATHISH KUMAR Vs BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010017982022 NC: 2026:KHC:54624 MFA No. 365 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.365 OF 2022 (CPC) BETWEEN: K.SATHISH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.365 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
K.SATHISH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
REVENUE INSPECTOR
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER (WEST)
BHASYAM PARK, SHESHADRIPURAM,
BENGALURU 560 020
…APPELLANT
(BY
SRI.SYED
HUSSAIN,
ADV.
FOR
SRI.
RAMESH
N.J.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
N R SQUARE
BENGALURU 560 002
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2.
THE COMMISSIONER
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
COMMISSIONER OFFICE, DISCIPLINARY
AUTHORITY,
N R SQUARE
BENGALURU 560 002
3.
SRI N SUBBARAO
ENQUIRY OFFICER AND RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY, COUNCIL OFFICE BUILDING
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
N R SQUARE
BENGALURU 560 002
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA M
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.SUNITHA.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1 & R-2)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 07.12.2021 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN
OS.NO.2575/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XXV ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, CCH.NO.23, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1
AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for appellant.
2. It is seen from the online copy of the order of the trial Court in O.S. No.2575/2021 that the suit has been dismissed on 09.03.2023.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that a miscellaneous petition has been filed to restore the suit, which is pending adjudication.
4. Be that as it may, in view of the fact the suit is dismissed, the present appeal would not survive for consideration. Appellant is at liberty to file necessary
HC-KAR
appeal as and when the suit is restored, if he is so advised and aggrieved by the order.
5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
GSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28