Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8492/2024 of SRI CHANDAN BALLAL Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010418342024 NC: 2026:KHC:54461 CRL.P No. 8492 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8492 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHANDAN BALLAL S/O K JAYAPRAKASH BALLAL, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8492 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI CHANDAN BALLAL
S/O K JAYAPRAKASH BALLAL,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT NO 22A/A, 8TH CROSS,
1ST STAGE, NEAR PU YUSUF SHOP
UDAYAGIRI, MYSORE-570 019
2.
SMT MEENA
W/O CHANDAN BALLAL
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT NO 1201, 3RD STAGE,
KESARI AJJU BROTHERS,
N.R MOHALLA, MYSORE 570 007
3.
SRI NISAR AHMED
S/O SRI DILSHAD
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
R/AT NO 334, EWS 3RD STAGE,
HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANNIMANTAP
MYSURU-570 001
4.
SMT MANJULA
D/O SRI KRISHNAIAH
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
R/AT HARIJANA STREET,
DODDARAYAPETE VILLAGE & POST,
CHAMARAJNAGAR TALUK
CHAMARAJNAGAR-571 313
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. RAJESHWARI M, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY UDAYAGIRI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX BANGALORE
2.
DR GOPINATH
DISTRICT HEALTH & WELFARE OFFICER,
WELFARE OFFICE, MYSURU
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 65/2024
OF UDAYAGIRI POLICE, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT AT
MYSURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 312, 314, 315, 316 OF IPC
AND
SECTION
OF
THE
MEDICAL
TERMINATION
OF
PREGNANCY ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7