Karnataka High Court
RP/88/2025 of STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SRI. T K SUBRAMANYA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010102652025 NC: 2026:KHC:54319 RP No. 88 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS REVIEW PETITION NO. 88 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
REVIEW PETITION NO. 88 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
M.S. BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD
BENGALURU-560 009.
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANT
TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
BENGALURU-560 001.
4.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANT
TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
BENGALURU-560 001.
5.
THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560 064.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. VAHEEDA, AGA)
Digitally signed by
JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
SRI. T.K. SUBRAMANYA
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
R/AT TARABANAHALLI VILLAGE
JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK
BENGALURU-560 064.
…RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE
1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, 1908 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS
REVIEW PETITION, BY REVIEWING THE ORDER DATED
13.01.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WRIT
PETITION NO.718/2023, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed a memo dated 30.09.2026 stating that the prayer made in the Review Petition has become infructuous, since the phodi and durasth as directed by this Court has been completed, although not within the time frame fixed by this Court.
HC-KAR
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the Revision Petition stands disposed of in view of the memo.
4. In view of the disposal of the main petition, pending Interlocutory Applications do not survive for consideration and are accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL CT:SM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28