Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1338/2024 of SRI BHYREGOWDA Vs SRI C VEERANNAGOWDA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010086912024 NC: 2026:KHC:54458 CRL.P No. 1338 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1338 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI BHYREGOWDA S/O GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010086912024
NC: 2026:KHC:54458
CRL.P No. 1338 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1338 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI BHYREGOWDA
S/O GANGANNA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
SAROVARA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
1000, B. K.R.S GOWDA EXTENSION
H.M.T BADAVANE
NAGASANDRA MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE-560 073
2.
SMT. SHRUTHI KUSHAL
D/O KUSHALAPPA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
SAROVARA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
1000, B. K.R.S. GOWDA EXTENSION
H.M.T BADAVANE
NAGASANDRA MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE-560073
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHAT SHANKAR SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
SRI. C. VEERANNAGOWDA
S/O LATE DODDEERANNA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT RETIRED GOVT SERVENT
R/AT NO.SAMBRUDDI NILAYA
BEHIND GANESHA TEMPLE
NAGANNANAPALYA SIRA GATE
TUMKUR CITY-572 101
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010086912024
NC: 2026:KHC:54458
CRL.P No. 1338 of 2024
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.187/2021, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
J.M.F.C., TUMAKURU REGISTERED U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT R/W
200 OF CR.P.C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1