Karnataka High Court
CCC/546/2025 of SRI. G. HULIYAPPA Vs MR. R. GANGADHAR on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010314532025 NC: 2026:KHC:54272-DB CCC No. 546 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.V.BHAVANI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 546 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.V.BHAVANI
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 546 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI.G.HULIYAPPA,
S/O LATE SRI.GANGANNA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 55/1, NEW NO.3,
4TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, MICHAEL PALYA,
NEAR CMH HOSPITAL, INDIRANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 038
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI.N.SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.BHUVANENDRA RAJU.P AND P.B.RAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR.R.GANGADHAR,
S/O R.RAVINDRA NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.119, AKSHAYA PEDSTONE,
SEEGEHALLI MAIN ROAD,
OPP. SHELL PETROL PUMP,
SEEGEHALLI, BENGALURU- 560 067.
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI PRASHANTH MURTHY.S.G, ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 BY THE
COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDERS OF
THIS
COURT
IN
M.F.A.NO.7780/2024
DATED
10.01.2025
(ANNEXURE-F) AND PUNISH HIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally
signed by K G
RENUKAMBA
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.V.BHAVANI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
The instant petition alleges willful disobedience of the order dated 10.01.2025 passed in M.F.A.No.7780/2024 whereby this Court in the appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of CPC, set aside the impugned order passed by the trial Court partly and restrained defendant No.1, who is the accused in this petition from interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaintiff and creating any third party rights in respect of 'A' schedule property.
2. The submission of learned Counsel for the accused is that deeds of sale were executed by the accused on 24.05.2024 and 27.05.2024 in favour of third parties at the point of time when there was no existing interim order by the trial Court operating in favour of the complainant. It is further stated that the complainant has already filed Misc.No.25072/2024 before the trial Court seeking detention of the accused in civil prison for alleged disobedience relying upon
HC-KAR
the events of 24.05.2024 and 27.05.2024, which are the sale deeds executed by the accused.
3. In our considered opinion, it is for the complainant to approach the Civil Court and pursue his remedies in accordance with law. This contempt petition is accordingly consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (N.V.BHAVANI) JUDGE
KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13