Karnataka High Court
WP/29231/2019 of SRI. M. N. MOHAN KUMAR Vs SRI. RAKESH on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010192492019 NC: 2026:KHC:54380 WP No. 29231 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 29231 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. M. N. MOHAN KUMAR S/O D.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 29231 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. N. MOHAN KUMAR
S/O D. NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1178, 3RD CROSS
KURUBAGERI, IRWIN ROAD
LASHKAR MOHALLA
MYSORE - 570 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VISWANATHA SETTY V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. RAKESH
S/O D. NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRST & BUSINESS
R/AT D.NO.1178, 3RD CROSS,
KURUBARAGERI, IRVIND ROAD
LASHKAR MOHALLA
MYSURU - 570 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAKESH M.N, PARTY IN PERSON)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
Digitally
signed by
ANNAPURNA
G
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
DTD 11.03.2019 PASSED BY THE PASSED BY THE III ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ANEKAL IN P AND SC
NO.5019/2018
ON
THE
APPLICATION
FILED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) OF CPC VIDE
ANNX-R BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE W.P AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Captioned petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Court below on an application filed by the respondent, who appeared in person, seeking to come on record in the proceedings. The respondent is none other than the full brother of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner had instituted proceedings under Section of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, in P&SC No.5019/2018, seeking grant of probate in respect of the testamentary instrument relied upon by him. In the said proceedings, the petitioner caused a paper publication inviting objections from persons interested in the estate.
HC-KAR
3. Pursuant to the paper publication, the respondent appeared before the probate Court and filed an application seeking to be impleaded. He specifically contended that the properties covered under the alleged Will are also the subject matter of a pending partition suit in O.S.No.588/2018. He also disputed the testamentary disposition relied upon by the petitioner and asserted his interest in the properties forming the subject matter of the probate proceedings.
4. The learned probate Court, having considered the objections raised by the respondent and having noticed that a partition suit in respect of the properties in question is pending adjudication, found that the respondent had a legitimate interest in the subject matter of the proceedings. Accordingly, the application seeking impleadment came to be allowed.
5. This Court finds no infirmity in the exercise of discretion by the learned probate Court. Once the petitioner had invoked the jurisdiction of the probate Court under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and caused a paper publication, an interested person who comes forward pursuant thereto cannot be shut out from participating in the
HC-KAR
proceedings, particularly when such person asserts a direct interest in the estate and disputes the testamentary disposition.
6. The petitioner cannot seek an ex parte adjudication of the petition for grant of probate merely because the proceedings were initially instituted by him. The very purpose of issuing a citation or causing a paper publication is to afford an opportunity to persons having an interest in the estate to enter appearance and contest the claim, if so advised. In the present case, the respondent, being the petitioner’s own brother, has appeared pursuant to the publication and has specifically asserted that the properties covered under the alleged Will are also the subject matter of the pending partition suit.
7. In these circumstances, the probate Court was justified in permitting the respondent to come on record. The petitioner cannot claim a right to obtain probate without the objections of an interested person being adjudicated, particularly when the respondent has raised a specific and substantial dispute
HC-KAR
concerning both the testamentary disposition and the properties forming the subject matter of the proceedings.
8. Therefore, the order impugned does not suffer from any jurisdictional error or perversity warranting interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15