Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/13594/2024 of RAMANNA GOWDA Vs THE STATE on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010693892024 NC: 2026:KHC:54463 CRL.P No. 13594 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13594 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. RAMANNA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13594 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
RAMANNA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA GOWDA
MERKAJE HOUSE, MALAYALA,
YENEKAL VILLAGE, KADABA T.Q (D.K)
2.
YADUCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O BALAKRISHNA GOWDA
KUJUMBARU, MERKAJE HOUSE
YENEKAL VILLAGE, KADABA T.Q (D.K)
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOULYA. S, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE
REPRESENTED BY SUBRAHMANYA P.S
SUBRAHMANYA, SULLIA T.Q, D.K
PIN CODE-574 238
2.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
D.K DISTRICT, PANDESHWARA,
MANGALORU (D.K)
PIN CODE-575 001
3.
ANANDA NAIKA
POLICE STAFF (SHO & I.0)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SUBRAHMANYA P.S
SUBRAHMANYA, SULLIA T.Q, D.K
PIN CODE-574 238
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO KINDLY PASS AN ORDER FOR QUASH OF
CRIMINAL CASE / INCOMPLETE BASELESS CHARGE SHEET
FILED BY THE SUBRAHMANYA P.S. IN CR.NO.25/2024 TO THE
COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SULLIA (D.K.) IN
C.C.NO.756/2024 U/S 427, 447, 504 AND 34 OF IPC BY
CONSIDERING THE GROUNDS ABOVE SHOWN.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12