Karnataka High Court

WP/24291/2021 of MR THIRUMALESHWARA BHAT Vs SHANKARAPPA K on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010490662021 NC: 2026:KHC:54292 WP No. 24291 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 24291 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR THIRUMALESHWARA BHAT AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

WRIT PETITION NO. 24291 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

MR THIRUMALESHWARA BHAT

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS

S/O K KESHAVA BHAT

RA/T PERIADKA HOUSE

SAVANOOR VILLAGE

PUTTUR TQ - 574 202

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SACHIN B.S.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

SHANKARAPPA K

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

S/O LATE KITTAPPA

"SIRI COMPLEX"

NO 31/1, 7TH CROSS

MUNESHWARA BLOCK

KANTEERAVA STUDIO MAIN ROAD

NANDINI LAYOUT

BENGALORE - 560 096.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. GANESHA G., ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH

SECTION

482 OF

CR.P.C.

PRAYING

TO-QUASH

ENTIRE

PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.3587/2017 ON THE FILE OF COURT

Digitally signed

by

ANNAPURNA G

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

OF LXI CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE

REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 384 AND

420 OF IPC AS PER ANNEXURE-A.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. Memo reads as under : "The undersigned counsel for the Petitioner herewith submits, that the above Writ Petition has become infructuous as the Respondent-Complainant has withdrawn the Complaint, while seeking for liberty to file fresh Complaint.

The Trail Court by its order dated 03.01.2026 accepted the memo for withdrawal and disposed-off the impugned proceedings, by refusing to reserve the liberty as sought by the Respondent-Complainant.

In above circumstance, it is respectfully prayed that the above Writ Petition be disposed-off as having rendered infructuous, while reserving liberty to the

HC-KAR

Petitioner to approach this Hon'ble Court as and when the need arises."

2. Placing the memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead