Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10383/2024 of MR JAYANTH S VASISHT Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010540872024 NC: 2026:KHC:54464 CRL.P No. 10383 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10383 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR JAYANTH S VASISHT S/O G SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10383 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
MR JAYANTH S VASISHT
S/O G SUBRAMANYA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/O #489, 6TH A MAIN,
12TH CROSS, A G B LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560090
PRESENTLY R/O 520,
3RD MAIN, NEAR PATALAMMA TEMPLE,
BHARATH BHCS LAYOUT,
UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
VTC THURAHALLI,
PO SUBRAMANYAPURA,
BENGALURU-560061
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KAMALUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. UDAYA PRAKASH M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR,
KODIGE HALLI POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
CANFIN HOME LTD
SAHAKARANAGARA BRANCH,
BANGALORE-560 092
REPRESENTED BY R MADHUKUMAR,
ITS CHIEF MANAGER OF THE COMPANY
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1,
SRI. D. NARAYANASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CHARGE SHEET
AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CC NO.21683/2019 REGISTER BY
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR KODIGE HALLI POLICE STATION
PENDING ON THE FILE OF VII ADDL.CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE COURT AT BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/S 465, 468, 471, 472, 419, 420,120(B) R/W 149 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
During the course of arguments, on instructions by the investigation officer, learned HCGP submitted that the petitioner is not arrayed as accused in this case and he is cited as charge sheet witness No.4. Since the name of accused No.9 and CW.4 is one and same i.e., Jayanth S. Vasisht, inadvertently, the Police have filed an objection before the passport authority stating that this petitioner is accused No.9. He further submitted that accused No.9 is absconding and NBW is pending against him. In such circumstances, since the
HC-KAR
petitioner is cited only as a charge sheet witness No.4, the petition does not survive for further consideration and is accordingly, disposed of.
2. The respondent No.1 is directed to clarify the said aspect before the passport authority, forthwith.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17