Karnataka High Court
WP/4366/2024 of HALAPPA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010068872024 NC: 2026:KHC:54304 WP No. 4366 of 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 4366 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: HALAPPA S/O LATE NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010068872024
NC: 2026:KHC:54304
WP No. 4366 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
WRIT PETITION NO. 4366 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
HALAPPA
S/O LATE NINGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF
KAMALAPURA SANNAIAHNAHAT
KAMALAPURA MAJRE,
HANDANAKERE HOBLI,
CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK,
TIPTUR – 572 201.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANASOUDHA,
BANGALORE – 560 001.
2.
THE SECRETARY,
THE DEPARTMENT OF FOREST,
BANGALORE 575 003.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
TUMKUR DISTRICT,
TUMKUR-572 101.
4.
THE DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER,
TUMKUR DISTRICT,
TUMKUR-572 101.
Digitally signed
by SUMATHY
KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010068872024
NC: 2026:KHC:54304
WP No. 4366 of 2024
5.
THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER,
CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI,
CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI-572 214.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. HEMALATHA.V., AGA FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
27.06.2023 IN OS NO. 124/2022 AT ANNEXURE-C PASSED BY
THE ADL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TIPTUR.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo today, seeking leave to withdraw the present petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications stand closed.
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA