Karnataka High Court
WP/5796/2024 of SHRI NARESH VITTAL RAO PISE Vs THE AUTHORISED OFFICER on 30 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010118972024 NC: 2026:KHC:54725 WP No. 5796 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 5796 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI NARESH VITTAL RAO PISE S/O SRI VITTAL RAO
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 5796 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRI NARESH VITTAL RAO PISE
S/O SRI VITTAL RAO PISE
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO F-101
NITYA SADAN, 2ND FLOOR
RMV II STAGE, SANAJAYNAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 094
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI./SMT. KANCHAN S., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VISHWANATH N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
HDFC BANK LTD.
GROUND FLOOR NO.3/1
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE, DTD. 09.02.2024 FIXING THE DATE
OF AUCTION ON 26.02.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN
RESPECT OF PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
Digitally signed
by PAVITHRA B
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the sale notice dated 09.02.2024 and the public auction held on 26.02.2024. This Court, while entertaining the writ petition, passed an interim order staying the conducting of the auction, subject to the petitioner paying 20% of the outstanding amount within two weeks. The condition reflected in the interim order was not complied with. Taking note of the disobedience of the interim order dated 26.02.2024, this Court, by a subsequent order dated 12.03.2024, has vacated the interim order.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the respondents have once again brought the property in question for sale through a sale notice dated 25.05.2026 and an auction was conducted on 17.06.2026 and the sale has been confirmed in favour of the successful bidder. It is also his submission that, challenging the subsequent
HC-KAR
sale proceedings, the petitioner has already approached the DRT by filing SA.No.2499/2026.
3. Therefore, he submits that the present petition has become infructuous. But the learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the opposite facts. Taking note of the submissions, the writ petition is dismissed having become infructuous. due to the subsequent developments.
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
TIN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3