Karnataka High Court

WP/37679/2025 of K S SIVAKUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010800502025 NC: 2026:KHC:54510 WP No. 37679 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 37679 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. K S SIVAKUMAR, S/O LATE SITHURAJIAH, AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

WRIT PETITION NO. 37679 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

K S SIVAKUMAR,

S/O LATE SITHURAJIAH,

AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS.

2.

PREMA SIVAKUMAR,

W/O K S SIVAKUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.

BOTH R/A #38/39, VINAYAKA

KOIL STREET, KELAMANGALAM,

DENKANIKOTTAI TALUK,

KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT,

TAMIL NADU-635113.

[PETITIONER NOS.1 AND 2,

SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED].

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. AJAY N, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BYADARAHALLI PS,

REPRESENTED BY THE

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

HIGH COURT BUILDING,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

Digitally signed

by CHETAN B C

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

2.

PAVITHRA C M,

W/O RUDRESH K S,

AGED MAJOR,

R/AT NO. 77/152,

SATISH BUILDING,

BEHIND GOVT. SCHOOL

BYADARAHALLI,

BENGALURU-560091.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SURYA MUKUNDARAJ, ADDL. SPP FOR R-1)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION READ WITH SECTION 482

OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO ISSUE

AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING

ENTIRE PROCEEDING C.C.NO.8138/2022 PENDING ON THE

FILE

OF

THE

LEARNED

CHIEF

JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE,

BENGALURU

RURAL,

BENGALURU,

FOR

THE

OFFENCES

PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 504 AND 506 R/W 34 OF

THE

INDIAN

PENAL

CODE,

ARRAIGNING

THE

PETITIONERS AS ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 (VIDE ANNEXURE-D)

AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

The Petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural, and therefore, the Petitioner does not wish to continue the present petition.

Hence, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit withdrawal of the present petition and dismiss the same as withdrawn.”

2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

CBC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead