Karnataka High Court
MFA/6595/2022 of SRI. P. SANJEEV KUMAR Vs SMT. HARSHINI RAO on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010437772022 NC: 2026:KHC:54245-DB MFA No. 6595 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6595 OF 2022 (FC-)
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010437772022
NC: 2026:KHC:54245-DB
MFA No. 6595 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6595 OF 2022 (FC-)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. P. SANJEEV KUMAR
S/O SRI. N. PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT NO. 432/4,
ROYAL ENCLAVE
3RD AVENUE
ANNANAGAR EAST
CHENNAI 600 102
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NAGENDRA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
SMT. HARSHINI RAO
W/O SRI. P. SANJEEV KUMAR
D/O SRI. A. VASANTHA RAO
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.C-402,
VAISHNAVI NAKSHATHRA APARTMENT ,
TUMKUR ROAD, YESHWANTHAPUR
BENGALURU 560 022
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. LIKITHA.M, FOR
SRI. RAKSHITH R., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.07.2022 PASSED
IN MC NO.3573/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL PRL.
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B
K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010437772022
NC: 2026:KHC:54245-DB
MFA No. 6595 of 2022
JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION
FILED UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS
APPEAL,
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS, THIS
DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
We have taken up this appeal in the revised call. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal either in the first call or in the revised call.
2. It appears that the appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
RKA; CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15