Karnataka High Court
WP/10786/2024 of PADMA Vs VARADEGOWDA on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010204942024 NC: 2026:KHC:54022 WP No. 10786 of 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAAT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29THDAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 10786 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. PADMA D/O PUTTEGOWDA, W/O LOKESH, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKAAT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29THDAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
WRIT PETITION NO. 10786 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
PADMA
D/O PUTTEGOWDA,
W/O LOKESH,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT M.SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE,
RAVANDUR HOBLI,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT.571107.
2.
NAGAMMA
D/O PUTTEGOWDA,
W/O BUDUSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT HUNDIMALA VILLAGE,
BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT.571105.
3.
TULASI
D/O PUTTEGOWDA
W/O LAKSHMAN,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/AT KENCHENAGERE,
HOSAKOTE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,
HUNSUR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT.571105.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KARUMBAIAH.T.A., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
VARADEGOWDA
S/O LATE DALEGOWDA,
AGED 75 YEARS,
KOTHAVALLIKOPPALU GRAMA,
BETTADAPURA HOBLI,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK,
MYSORE TALUK.571107.
2.
PUTTAMANAMMA
W/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED 73 YEARS,
3.
KAMALAMMA
W/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED 68 YEARS,
4.
MAHADEVA
S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED 56 YEARS,
5.
KALEGOWDA
S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED 54 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 ARE
RESIDING AT KANCHINAKERE
HOSAKOTEGRAMA,
KASABA HOBLI,HUNSUR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-E
THE ORDER DATED 11.03.2024 PASSED BY THE ADDL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC AT PERIYAPATNA ON IA NO.V IN O.S.NO.
158/2016 AND ALLOW IA NO.V FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS
PRAYED FOR.
THIS
WRIT
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo today, in terms of which, it is contended that the matter has become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications stand closed.
(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE BMV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2
Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA