Karnataka High Court
WP/22580/2022 of SMT. G GOWRAMMA Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010526912022 NC: 2026:KHC:54008 WP No. 22580 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 22580 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. G. GOWRAMMA W/O V. GOPALAIAH AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010526912022
NC: 2026:KHC:54008
WP No. 22580 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 22580 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
SMT. G. GOWRAMMA
W/O V. GOPALAIAH
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
NO.176, HUTHANAHALLI,
CHIKKAJALA POST, JALA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 562 157.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRIKANTH M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION BANK OF INDIA
RAJAJINAGAR BRANCH
NO. 25/2, FIRST MAIN
DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, II STAGE
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010
REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER
AND CHIEF MANAGER.
2.
SRI. V. GOPALAIAH
S/O VASUDEVAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
NO. 176, HUTHANAHALLI,
CHIKKAJALA POST, JALA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TLAUK
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010526912022
NC: 2026:KHC:54008
WP No. 22580 of 2022
BENGALURU - 562 157.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SATYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE DATED 29.10.2022 ISSUED UNDER
RULE 8 OF THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES
2002, FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 29.09.2026, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21