Karnataka High Court
RFA/566/2021 of THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs SMT SALMA SULTANA on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010309972020 NC: 2026:KHC:54980 RFA No. 566 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 566 OF 2021 (INJ-) BETWEEN: 1. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010309972020
NC: 2026:KHC:54980
RFA No. 566 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 566 OF 2021 (INJ-)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
KUMARA PARK EAST,
BENGALURU-560020.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT. DEEPTI AYATHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT SALMA SULTANA
W/O SRI PYREJAN,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NO.54/12,
KADUSONNEPPAHALLI,
BIDARAHALLI HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU-560 025
REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER
SRI A HABEEBUR RAHMAN,
S/O A MOHAMMED AMEEN,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT NO.33, NORRIS ROAD,
RICHMOND TOWN,
BENGALURU-560 025.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by VINUTHA B
S
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010309972020
NC: 2026:KHC:54980
RFA No. 566 of 2021
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.03.2019
PASSED IN OS.NO.26383/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL
UNIT, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT
INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
As recorded in the office note, the sole respondent died in the year 2024. Till date no steps are taken to bring the legal representatives of deceased sole respondent.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 119