Karnataka High Court
MFA/4662/2026 of N GIRISH Vs THE JUPITER CRICKETERS ASSOCIATION on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010428262026 NC: 2026:KHC:54349 MFA No. 4662 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4662 OF 2026 (CPC) BETWEEN: N GIRISH S/O SRI NARASIMHA AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4662 OF 2026 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
N GIRISH
S/O SRI NARASIMHA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT NO.85, ANUGRAHA, 2ND MAIN
AGS LAYOUT, AREHALLI
BENGALURU-560061
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHARATH S GOWDA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE JUPITER CRICKETERS ASSOCIATION
NO.42, 8TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN
SRINIDHI LAYOUT, KONANKUNTE
BENGALURU-560 062
REP BY ITS SECRETARY,
CLUB REGISTERED UNDER
KARNATAKA SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT 1960.
2.
THE KARNATAKA STATE CRICKET ASSOCIATION
(KSCA), M.G. ROAD,
BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/
THE SECRETARY
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.C. SHANKAR REDDY.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1; SRI.A.S.VISHWAJITH.,ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA M
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 04.06.2026 PASSED ON IA FILED
U/O 39 RULE 1 AND 2 AND ANOTHER IA. FILED U/O 39 RULE 4
OF CPC IN O.S.NO.4082/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE IX
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
CCH-5, REJECTING IA FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 OF CPC
ALLOWING THE IA. FILED U/O 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to move an application seeking vacating of the impugned order in case of change in circumstances as contemplated under Order - XXXIX Rule - 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the appellant to approach this Court in case of change in circumstances, if so advised, in accordance with law.
HC-KAR
4. In view of dismissal of this appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any would not survive for consideration and the same pale into insignificance.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE GSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37