Karnataka High Court
MFA/381/2024 of SMT. PRATHIMA B Vs SRI. SATHISH S @ SHIVALINGASWAMY on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010051262024 NC: 2026:KHC:53919-DB MFA No. 381 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 381 OF 2024 (FC) BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 381 OF 2024 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PRATHIMA B
W/O SRI SATHISH S.
@ SHIVALINGASWAMY
D/O BASAVAMARI
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/O AGATAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI
PANDAVAPURA TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 434.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI HARISCHANDRA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI SATHISH S.
@ SHIVALINGASWAMY
S/O SRI SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/O NO 10, RAMAMANDIRA ROAD
VINAYA NAGAR (PADUVARAHALLI)
MYSURU – 570 019.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.T. BOPAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI BHARGAVA D. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY
COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
Digitally signed
by G
SHREERAKSHA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
23.11.2023 PASSED IN M.C.NO.637/2022 ON THE FILE OF
THE
PRINCIPAL
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
MYSURU,
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(i-a) OF
THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
and
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS)
Both the parties have filed a joint memo dated 27.09.2026 stating that they have amicably resolved all their matrimonial disputes and differences. After due deliberation and at the intervention of their well-wishers and elders, the parties have voluntarily decided to resume and continue their matrimonial life and live together as husband and wife, peacefully and harmoniously. Consequently, the appellant has undertaken to take necessary steps for withdrawing all other proceedings that she had initiated against the respondent including Execution Case No.84/2025, Criminal Misc.No.159/2026, Criminal Misc.No.117/2024 and M.C.No.28/2023.
HC-KAR
2. Both the parties are present before the Court. On this Court asking the parties, the parties have stated that they have understood the terms of the agreement in the joint memo and that they shall abide by the terms of the agreement.
3. In terms of the mutual agreement of the parties, the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 23.11.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysore in M.C.No.637/2022 is hereby quashed and set aside.
4. The parties shall be bound by the terms of the agreement as found in the joint memo. [[
[
5. The Miscellaneous First Appeal is accordingly disposed off in terms of the joint memo.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
BNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1