Karnataka High Court
CCC/676/2024 of SRI. RANGANATH SHIVARAM Vs SMT. RADHIKA PATIL on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010371402024 NC: 2026:KHC:54133-DB CCC No. 676 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 676 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI.
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010371402024
NC: 2026:KHC:54133-DB
CCC No. 676 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 676 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. RANGANATH SHIVARAM
S/O SHIVARAM H,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NO.526, 19TH CROSS, 26TH CROSS,
KIRLOSKAR LAYOUT, SIDEDAHALLI,
BANGALORE NORTH, PO NAGASANDRA,
BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT,
BANGALORE-560 073.
MOB 9535041234,
EMAIL ranganathec@gmail.com
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SMT. SOFIYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. RADHIKA PATIL
D/O MARUTHIGOUDA PATIL,
W/O SRI RANGANATH SHIVARAM,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
GIRNAR PRIDE APARTMENT, FLAT NO.D-4,
3RD FLOOR, SHIVABASAV NAGAR, BELGAVI-590 010.
MOB 7204816506
EMAIL radhikapatil1994@gmail.com
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI. BHANU PRAKASH H.V.,ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT
OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR
Digitally
signed by
MALA K N
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010371402024
NC: 2026:KHC:54133-DB
CCC No. 676 of 2024
WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THE HON’BLE III
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE
DATED 15.04.2024 IN M.C.NO.2279/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE - A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEAR BEFORE CHARGE, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present contempt petition has been filed by the husband/complainant alleging second marriage by the wife when the interim order restraining the parties to contract second marriage was in force. In such a situation, no contempt lies. However, if ultimately the complainant succeeds, the second marriage of the wife would be null and void. Therefore, the contempt petition dismissed. The contempt notice stands discharged.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE
KNM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28