Karnataka High Court
WP/11254/2022 of SMT. PALLAVI KARANTH Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010252262022 NC: 2026:KHC:54002 WP No. 11254 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 11254 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. PALLAVI KARANTH W/O PRASHANTH
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010252262022
NC: 2026:KHC:54002
WP No. 11254 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO. 11254 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PALLAVI KARANTH
W/O PRASHANTH KARANTH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
HOUSE NO. 2-90,
NARIKOMBU NEAR PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
NARIKOMBU POST AND VILLAGE,
BANTWAL TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 231.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUSHAL TIWARI N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 008.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR
BANTWAL TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 211.
3.
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
BANTWAL CROSS ROAD BRANCH
JODU MARGA POST, BANTWAL
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010252262022
NC: 2026:KHC:54002
WP No. 11254 of 2022
DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 219.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. MANJUNATH RAYAPPA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. B.N. TULSI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER NO.
MAG(2)CR 75/2022/171014/C4 DTD 30.04.2022 PASSED BY
THE R1 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 29.09.2026, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the said memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
HDK