Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/14161/2024 of YATHISH PERUVAI Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010713422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54225 CRL.P No. 14161 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14161 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. YATHISH PERUVAI, S/O NARAYANA MULYA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14161 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
YATHISH PERUVAI,
S/O NARAYANA MULYA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT ASHWATHA NAGARA,
PERUVAI VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK-574 260.
2.
RAMDAS SHETTY,
S/O BALU SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
PATHRATHOTA HOUSE,
VEERAKAMBA POST,
CHAIRMAN , VTV, V MEDIA NETWORK,
1ST FLOOR, LAMPS SOCIETY BUILDING,
DAKSHINA KANNADA-574 222.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI JAYAPRAKASH K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
VITTAL P S, BANTWAL TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA-574 243.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
NAFEESA,
W/O MOHAMMED HANEEF,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT DOOR NO 1-41/1, KADEMBILA HOUSE,
PERUVAI VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK-574 260.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.
NO.1475/2024 PENDING BEFORE THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, BANTWAL, D.K. FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 499, 500, 501 R/W 34 OF IPC VIDE ANNEXURE B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 14.10.2025. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one year. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10