Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/260/2024 of MRS SHOBHA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 29 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010006142024 NC: 2026:KHC:54226 CRL.P No. 260 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 260 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SHOBHA, W/O SRI PADMANBHA @ RAVI, AGED ABOUT 54
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 260 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. SHOBHA,
W/O SRI PADMANBHA @ RAVI,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
2.
SRI PADMANABHA @ RAVI,
S/O LATE K J KENCHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.149/3,
2ND MAIN, MANJUNATH COMPLEX,
BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD,
1ST BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 011.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI DHANANJAYA N R, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
SIDDAPURA P.S.,
JAYANAGAR SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
SMT. K RATHANAMMA,
D/O LATE ESHWAR,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
R/AT NO.3563, 11TH MAIN,
3RD CROSS, CHANDRA NAGARA,
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT,
BENGALURU - 78.
3.
KUMAR,
S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
4.
PADAMAVATHI @ PADMA,
W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
5.
MADHU,
S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS.
RESP. NOS. 3 TO 5 ARE R/AT:
NO.16/1, 1ST CROSS,
1ST MAIN, BYRASANDRA,
JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK,
BANGALORE CITY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.12668/2019
PENDING BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE REGISTERED BY THE SIDDAPURA
POLICE STATION (RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN) AGAINST THE
PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.406, 420, 120-B R/W
SEC.34 OF IPC, ALONG WITH SEC.76 OF THE CHIT FUND ACT,
1982.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 27.03.2025. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since one year. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2