Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2151/2024 of HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHAPPA BANAKER Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010130852024 NC: 2026:KHC:53627 CRL.P No. 2151 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2151 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHAPPA BANAKER SON OF
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2151 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
HANUMANTHA @ HANUMANTHAPPA BANAKER
SON OF BASANAGOWDA B. BANAKER,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
NO.4, ANJANEYA TEMPLE,
KENCHANAHALLI,
RAJARJESHWARINAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 098
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF
RESIDING AT NO.72,
JOGIHALI,
TAVARAGI,
HIREKORUR
HAVERI - 581 111
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR K N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
SMT. JAYALAKSHMI,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
PRESENTLY AT NO.75,
NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR
KENCHANAHALLI
BANGALORE - 560 098.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.8156/2013
(CR.NO.18/2013) FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A OF IPC
PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. C.M.M., XLVI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Despite granting sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to comply the office objections, the same has not been done by the petitioners.
2. The matter was listed today for dismissal, despite there is no representation for the petitioner.
HC-KAR
3. This petition is of the year 2024 and there is no reason to grant further time to comply the office objections and it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
4. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9