Karnataka High Court
WP/23660/2026 of H P RAVI Vs THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010519192026 NC: 2026:KHC:53796 WP No. 23660 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 23660 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: H P RAVI, S/O LATE PAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 23660 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
H P RAVI,
S/O LATE PAPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT B. HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562125.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI A.N GANGADHARAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
BANGALORE-560009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION,
BANGALORE-560009.
3.
SMT. H.P. PADMA,
W/O NANJA REDDY.N,
D/O. LATE PAPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT. NO.21, 3RD CROSS,
NEAR FLOUR MILL, HOSAPALYA,
BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
BANGALORE-560068.
HC-KAR
4.
SMT. GOWRAMMA,
W/O. LATE PAPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS,
R/AT. B. HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562125.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHIVAREDDY.V, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE
INDIAN
CONSTITUTION
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08-07-2025 PASSED BY THE
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER I.E., RESPONDENT NO.1 IN
APPEAL NO.. MAG/4/SC-CR/27/2023-24 VIDE ANNEXURE-A
AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 31.08.2026 to withdraw the writ petition. The said memo reads as under:
"WITHDRAWAL ΜΕΜΟ The petitioner above named most respectfully submits that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present petition any further and, therefore, seeks permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the same, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. WHEREFORE, the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the withdrawal Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA
HC-KAR
of the present petition, with liberty as prayed for, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. BENGALURU DATE:
Sd/-
Petitioner
Advocate For Petitioner"
2. In view of the memo, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in accordance with law.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
BS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 59
Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA