Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8361/2024 of MR S SRINIDHI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010432152024 NC: 2026:KHC:53629 CRL.P No. 8361 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8361 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR. S. SRINIDHI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. LATE MR.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8361 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
MR. S. SRINIDHI
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
S/O. LATE MR. SRINATH,
NO.22/18, 2ND CROSS,
MGK LAYOUT,
CHAMARAJPET,
BANGALORE-560 040
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH B MUCHANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY HSR LAYOUT POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE-560001
2.
SMT. NIRMALA PRAKASHA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
W/O DR. H.P. PRAKASHA
R/ AT NO.181," GAURI",
13TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS,
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SECTOR 5, HSR LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560 102
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNNS) OF
CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 08.02.2022
PASSED
BY
THE
HON'BLE
XXXVII
ADDITIONAL
CHIEF
METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE
AT
BENGALURU
IN
C.C.NO.21064/2015 BEING CONFIRMED BY THE HON'BLE LV
ADDITIONAL
CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE
AT
BENGALURU (CCH-56) BY ITS ORDER DATED 28.03.2023 IN
CRL.RP.NO.450/2022
AND
ALLOW
THE
DISCHARGE
APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SEC.239
CRPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo dated 28.09.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner in the above case submits that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased permit to withdraw the above petition with liberty to refile the petition with
HC-KAR
proper annexures, to meet in the interest of justice."
3. Placing memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty sought in the memo.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4