Karnataka High Court
WP/50094/2018 of SHRI. RAKSHITH RAJ M R Vs DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010217462018 NC: 2026:KHC:53597 WP No. 50094 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 50094 OF 2018 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. RAKSHITH RAJ M R S/O LATE RAJANNA M S
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 50094 OF 2018 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. RAKSHITH RAJ M R
S/O LATE RAJANNA M S
1453 ,CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGARA,
BEHIND SUBBAIAHA GODOWN ROAD,
MANDYA TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGE
EDUCATION,
2ND FLOOR, DTE BUILDING,
PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2.
THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,
MYSORE REGIONAL OFFICE,
KRS ROAD,MEDAR BLOCK,
CFTRI CAMPUS,YADAVAGIRI,
MYSORE - 570 005
Digitally
signed by
PRAKASH N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 01
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ASHVINI PATIL, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO EXTEND THE PETITIONER A JOB ON
COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS AT THE EARLIEST AND DISPOSE
OFF THE PENDING CASE OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE
RESPONDENTS ACCORDINGLY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. The memo reads as under: “The undersigned counsel for the petitioner respectfully submits that, acting upon instructions, the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present petition any further. In light of the above, it is respectfully prayed
HC-KAR
that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed, in the interest of justice.”
2. In light of the memo filed, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
3. Pending I.As, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE SKS