Karnataka High Court
WP/13136/2025 of MR. AMAN DEEP SINGH Vs GILWOOD FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED on 28 September 2026
WP NO. 13136/2025 (GM - CPC) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU [MR. AMAN DEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. GILWOOD FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED] 28.09.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER The issue in the present appeal is
CNR: KAHC010285282025
WP NO. 13136/2025 (GM - CPC)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
[MR. AMAN DEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. GILWOOD
FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED]
28.09.2026
(VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The issue in the present appeal is correctness of rejecting the prayer of the petitioner seeking counter claim after issues were being framed and commencement of recording of evidence. The trial Court rejected the said application.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly invited the attention of this Court to the judgment in Writ Petition No.439/2023 dated 15.02.2023, wherein it is held that the counter claim of issues are framed and commencement of evidence in commercial suit is not permissible, however, granted liberty to institute separate proceedings insofar as the subject matter of the counter claim.
In light of the above judgment, this Court finds no justification to entertain this petition, however liberty stands reserved in favourof the petitioner to initiate separate Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
CNR: KAHC010285282025 WP NO. 13136/2025 (GM - CPC)
proceedings insofar as the subject matter of the counter claim as per law.
Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of.
In view of the above, office objections stands over ruled.
(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 129