Karnataka High Court

WP/10495/2024 of SRI NARAYANARAJE URS Vs SRI HANUMANTHARAJE URS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010195452024 NC: 2026:KHC:53557 WP No. 10495 of 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 10495 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. NARAYANARAJE URS S/O LATE THIMMARAJE URS,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

WRIT PETITION NO. 10495 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI. NARAYANARAJE URS

S/O LATE THIMMARAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,

R/AT NO. 2267/A, TO A1/A,

6TH CROSS (NORTH), KUVEMPUNAGAR,

B.M. ROAD, CHANNAPATNA TOWN-562 160.

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. KUMBAR VASANT FAKEERAPPA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. HANUMANTHARAJE URS,

SINCE DEAD BYHIS LRS,

GOWRAMMANNI AND OTHERS,

GOWRAMMANNI

W/O HANUMANTHE RAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS.

2.

SMT. VARALAKSHMI

D/O HANUMANTHA RAJE URS,

AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS,

3.

SMT. DHANALAKSHMMANI

D/O HANUMANTHA RAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

4.

SMT. LAKSHMI @ ALAMELAMMANI,

D/O HANUMANTHA RAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

Digitally signed by

SUMATHY

KANNAN

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE ALL

R/AT KUDLUR VILLAGE,

CHANNAPATNA TALUK,

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT-562 160.

5.

SRI. RAMAKRISHNA RAJE URS

S/O LATE THIMMARAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

RESIDINTG AT NO. 2267/7,

KUVEMPUNAGAR NORTH,

CHANNAPATNA TOWN-562 160.

6.

SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMANNI

W/O NANJUNDARAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT YEARS,

HOUSE OF KUMAR RAJE URS,

NO.10 NEXT TO VINAYAKA STORE,

SRICHAKRANAGAR, 2ND STAGE,

19TH CROSS, ACHARYA COLLEGE MAIN ROAD,

ANDRAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 091.

7.

SMT. BHAGYAMMANNI

W/O ODESH RAJE URS,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

R/AT HEMAVATHI,

NEW EXTENSION,

K.R.PETE TOWN,

MANDYA DISTRICT-571 426.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER

PASSED BY THE LEARNED SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT

CHANNAPATANA ON IA.NO.I IN EXECUTION NO.6/2023 DTD

01.03.2024 VIDE AT ANNEXURE-E.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed a memo in the Court today, wherein it is stated that the challenge in the present petition was to an order passed in Execution Petition No.6 of 2023. However, on 19.09.2026, the execution petition has been disposed of in the Lok-Adalat. Thus, he submits that the petition has become infructuous.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead