Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2279/2024 of SUBRAMANI Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010133242024 NC: 2026:KHC:53843 CRL.P No. 2279 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2279 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SUBRAMANI S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010133242024
NC: 2026:KHC:53843
CRL.P No. 2279 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2279 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SUBRAMANI
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/A NO 14, 2ND CROSS,
5TH MAIN ROAD,
SAMPANGIRAMA NAGAR,
BENGALURU, PIN-560027
MOBILE NO-7892355938
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. NAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
STATE BY DEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE 560001
2.
AISHA AHAMADI
W/O MOHAMAD IKBAL
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
NO 10, SAI ARCHED,
HESARAGATTA MAIN ROAD,
M.S PALYA, VIDHYRANYA PURA POST,
BANGALURU- 560022
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR DATED 17.11.2022, ON THE FILE OF THE
DEVANAHALLI POLICE JURISDICTION CR.NO.183/2022 U/S
419, 465, 468, 420, 506, 34 OF IPC AT 2ND ACJ AND JMFC AT
Digitally signed by
PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010133242024
NC: 2026:KHC:53843
CRL.P No. 2279 of 2024
DEVANAHALLI,
IN
SO
FAR
AS
THE
PETITIONER
IS
CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/-
(RAJESH RAI K)
JUDGE
HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1