Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/12220/2024 of ANURAG MOHANTY Vs HEMALATHA KUMARI on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010638362024 NC: 2026:KHC:53846 CRL.P No. 12220 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12220 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. ANURAG MOHANTY S/O LATE AKHAYA KUMAR MOHANTY,

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010638362024

NC: 2026:KHC:53846

CRL.P No. 12220 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12220 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

1.

ANURAG MOHANTY

S/O LATE AKHAYA KUMAR MOHANTY,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

2.

BHAGYALAXMI MOHANTY

W/O LATE AKHAYA KUMAR MOHANTY,

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

BOTH ARE R/AT FLAT NO.1317,

NEAR CDA COMPLEX,

MAHANDI VIHAR,

NAYABZAR PS CHAULI,

AGANJ DIST, CUTTACK-753004

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SYED KHALEEL PASHA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

HEMALATHA KUMARI

W/O ANURAG MOHANTY,

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

NO.93, MUNESHWAR LAYOUT,

SB GROUP, YEDIYURU,

BENGALURU CITY,

KARNATAKA-562 149

…RESPONDENT

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN

CRL.MISC.NO.359/2024,

WHICH

IS

PENDING

BEFORE

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT DEVANAHALLI.

Digitally signed by

PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010638362024

NC: 2026:KHC:53846

CRL.P No. 12220 of 2024

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.

2. Though this matter is posted for ninth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/-

(RAJESH RAI K)

JUDGE

HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead